The training programme on carbon pricing for shipping is divided into two parts. Part I covers foundational topics relating to carbon pricing for international shipping. Part II covers more advanced topics on the subject.
All materials are available free of charge and can be downloaded below.
Baresic, D. et al. (2022) Closing the Gap: An Overview of the Policy Options to Close the Competitiveness Gap and Enable an Equitable Zero-Emission Fuel Transition in Shipping. UMAS. Pages 26-29. Download.
Parry, I. et al. (2022) 'A Carbon Levy for International Maritime Fuels'. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 16 (1). Pages 25-29.
Baranzini, A. et al. (2017) ‘Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations’, WIREs Climate Change, 8(4). Pages 1-7. Download.
Dominioni, G. (2023) ‘Towards an equitable transition in the decarbonization of international maritime transport: Exemptions or carbon revenues?’, Marine Policy. Pages 3-6. Download.
Parry, I. et al. (2022) 'A Carbon Levy for International Maritime Fuels'. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 16 (1). Page 31.
Dominioni, G. and Englert, D. (2022) Carbon Revenues from International Shipping: Enabling an Effective and Equitable Energy Transition – Technical Paper. Washington, DC.: World Bank. Pages 47-49. Download.
The training programme on GHG pricing for shipping is divided into two parts. Part I covers foundational topics relating to GHG pricing for international shipping. Part II covers more advanced topics on the subject.
All materials are available free of charge and can be downloaded below.
Baresic, D. et al. (2022) Closing the Gap: An Overview of the Policy Options to Close the Competitiveness Gap and Enable an Equitable Zero-Emission Fuel Transition in Shipping. UMAS. Pages 26-29. Download.
Parry, Ian, et al. ‘A carbon levy for international maritime fuels.’ Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 16.1 (2022): 25-41, p. 31.
Baranzini, Andrea, et al. ‘Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations.’ Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8.4 (2017): e462, p. 6-7.
Amerasinhe, et al. (2017). Future of the Funds: Exploring the Architecture of Multilateral Climate Finance, WRI, pp25-57.
Reinsberg, et al. (2020). Climate Change-Related Trust Funds at the Multilateral Development Banks. GIZ, (2020).
GCF, Portfolio Risk Management. Download.